Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Walter

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1967PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Walter is guilty of taking an acknowledgment to a deed, as a notary public, when he never saw the grantor of the deed. The act was a violation of the statutes relating to the function of a notary public and was a misdemeanor. ORS 194.990.

The deed involved was one in which an office associate of Walter was the grantee. The sale of the land to Walter’s associate, for which the deed was given, became the subject of civil litigation. Vocu v. Eells, 1965, 240 Or 175, 400 P2d 516. Walter’s associate was accused of fraud in the transaction. However, it is not claimed that Walter had any part in or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re MorrisOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Vocu v. EellsOregon Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of MorrowOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of KrausOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. In Re SimsOregon Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API