Legal Opinion
Churchill v. Parnell
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 7, 1985No. F004807PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEST, J.
The issue in this case is whether title 3, California Administrative Code, section 6616 (hereinafter section 6616), is applicable to the State of California and to state agencies.
In June 1984, the Department of Fish and Game of the State of California, pursuant to an announced program for the management of the species of fish known as white bass, made multiple applications of the pesticide Rotenone to waters and waterways in the County of Tulare.
The white bass management program was initiated because the department had determined that white bass, which had been illegally…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. City of San FernandoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- House v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Balthasar v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Regents of University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Brown v. RuffenachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Department of Fish & Game v. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 72,223, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5640, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7853 Federal Trade Commission v. Mtk Marketing, Inc., D/B/A District Supply Center and Central Supply Center Nationwide Transport, Inc., D/B/A District Supply Center, Copy Resource Center, Inc., D/B/A District Supply Center and Central Supply Center Intel Marketing of California, Inc., D/B/A District Supply Center Telco Marketing, Inc., D/B/A Central Supply Center Paragon Shipping, Inc., D/B/A National Supply Center Acacia Properties, Inc., D/B/A National Supply Center Sam June Erick Graziano, A/K/A Eric Knight Donald N. Ryan Donna Green Colleen McCullough Jeanine Dora James Rem, D/B/A Central Supply Center and Jr AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Sacramento Mun. Utility Dist. v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Federal Trade Commission v. MTK Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports1989