Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports

Decided July 6, 1989No. 89-402Published

1Opinion of the Court

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL State of California JOHN K. VAN DE KAMP Attorney General ______________________________________ OPINION : : No. 89-402 of : : JULY 6, 1989 JOHN K. VAN DE KAMP : Attorney General : : RODNEY O. LILYQUIST : Deputy Attorney General : : ______________________________________________________________________________ THE CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF PHARMACY has requested an opinion on the following question: Is a pharmacy operated by the University of California subject to the licensure, inspection, and disciplinary provisions of the Pharmacy Law? CONCLUSION A pharmacy…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Kelley v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Tolman v. UnderhillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API