Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Goonewardene v. ADP, LLC

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 4, 2016No. B267010PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MANELLA, J.

In the underlying action, appellant Sharmalee Goonewardene’s fifth amended complaint asserted claims against respondents ADP, LLC, ADP Payroll Services, Inc., and AD Processing, LLC, for wrongful termination, violations of the Labor Code, and related causes of action, including breach of contract, negligent misrepresentation, and negligence. The trial court sustained respondents’ demurrers relating to the fifth amended complaint without leave to amend. Appellant contends the court abused its discretion in denying her leave to amend, arguing that her proposed sixth amended…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. In Re Tobacco II CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Richard Dent v. NflCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Copart, Inc. v. Sparta Consulting, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2018
  4. In re Arizona Theranos, Inc., LitigationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
  5. In re Ariz. Theranos, Inc., Litig.District Court, D. Arizona · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API