In re Ariz. Theranos, Inc., Litig.
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
H. Russel Holland, United States District Judge
Motions to Dismiss
Defendants move to dismiss plaintiffs' second amended consolidated class action complaint.1 These motions are opposed.2 Oral argument was requested and has been heard.
Background
Plaintiffs are A.R., B.B., B.P., D.L., L.M., M.P., R.C., R.G., S.J., and S.L. A.R. is alleged to be a resident of California.3 The other plaintiffs are alleged to be residents of Arizona.4 Defendants are Theranos, *1037Inc. ("Theranos"); Elizabeth Holmes; Ramesh Balwani; Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.; and Walgreen Arizona Drug Company.5
In 2003, Theranos was…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dennis Speerly v. General Motors, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
- Project44, Inc. v. FourKites, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2022
- Abira Medical Laboratories LLC v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Arizona IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Beaulieu v. National Mobility Elder Care IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
- Short v. Hyundai Motor America IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.