Legal Opinion

Matter of Maley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1996No. 49S00-9509-DI-1091PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DISCIPLINARY ACTION

2Per curiam

Attorney Francis M. Maley has been charged with collecting an unreasonable fee in violation of Rule 1.5(a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law. This case was presented to the duly-appointed hearing officer by way of respondent Ma-ley and the Disciplinary Commission’s “Stipulations of Fact and Misconduct.” The hearing officer has tendered to this Court her recommendation for sanction based on the parties’ stipulations, suggesting therein that the respondent receive a private reprimand.

This matter is now before this Court for final resolution. We have…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Buckler v. HiltIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Coviello v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Bauer v. BielIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. In Re PorterMontana Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Richert v. SchreiberIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re StephensIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Matter of LehmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re BenjaminIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re StephensIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. In the Matter of Robert E. LehmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API