Legal Opinion
In Re Stephens
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided May 31, 2007No. 45S00-0505-DI-244PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Attorney Discipline Action
Opinion on the Motion to Intervene by the Indiana Trial Lawyers Association
2Per curiam
On August 11, 2006, this Court approved a “Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline” under which Respondent received a public reprimand for violation of Indiana Professional Conduct Rules 1.5(a) and 1.8(a) for his fee arrangement with a client in a medical malpractice action. See In re Stephens, 851 N.E.2d 1256 (Ind.2006) (“Stephens I”). Pending before the Court is the “Verified Motion for Leave to Intervene and/or Appear as Amicus Curiae by the Indiana Trial Lawyers…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. St. Vincent Hospital, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1980
- Fresh Cut, Inc. v. FazliIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- Bauer v. BielIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
- Matter of MaleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- In Re HaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by39 opinions
- Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Plank v. Community Hospitals of Indiana, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2013
- Hilburn v. Enerpipe Ltd.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2019
- Kho v. PenningtonIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- G.F. v. St. Catherine Hospital, Inc., Vatsal K. Patel, D.O., and Indiana Patient's Compensation FundIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.