Bauer v. Biel
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtAx, J.
This cause comes to us by reason of the refusal of appellants to plead over after the court below sustained demurrers to a first and second paragraph of appellants’ second amended complaint.
Appellants’ first paragraph of amended complaint appears to be an action in tort for damages in defrauding appellants out of their right to collect attorney fees in connection with a Workmen’s Compensation proceeding. This first paragraph, omitting the caption, reads as follows:
“Plaintiffs complain of defendants, and each of them, and for amended complaint herein, allege and say:
1. That plaintiffs are…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miedreich v. RankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
- Buckler v. HiltIndiana Supreme Court · 1936
- Kitch, Administrator v. MoslanderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
- Richert v. SchreiberIndiana Court of Appeals · 1946
3Cited by10 opinions
- Herman v. Prudence Mutual Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1969
- In Re StephensIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
- Kizer v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Sanders v. TownsendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. FaulknerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.