Legal Opinion

Buckler v. Hilt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1936No. 26,445PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTreanor, J.

Appellant, as plaintiff below, brought suit to enforce a lien for attorney’s fees against a judgment which the appellant, as attorney for appellee Hilt, had caused to be entered in the Marion Circuit Court upon a compensation award made by the Industrial Board of Indiana. Appellant’s right to a lien for attorney’s fees was predicated upon a contract between himself and appellee Hilt, and specifically upon the provision that appellant was to receive as fees for his services in prosecuting Hilt’s industrial compensation claim a sum equal to thirty-three and one-third (33 %) per cent of any…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mackin v. Detroit-Timkin Axle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Yeiser v. DysartSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Chapman v. Railway Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Dysart v. YeiserNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Sarja v. Pittsburgh Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. St. Vincent Hospital, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Short v. Texaco, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Mieras v. DyncorpNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Foreman v. State Ex Rel. Department of Natural ResourcesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Hudock v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF VIRGINIACourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API