Legal Opinion

In Re Romano

California Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1966No. Crim. 9902PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, C. J.

Petitioner was convicted and sentenced in Kern County on one count of burglary (Pen. Code, § 459) and one count of grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487), the sentences to run concurrently. He was also convicted and sentenced in San Diego County on two counts of burglary, two counts of grand theft, and one count of conspiring to commit theft (Pen. Code, § 182). The sentences for grand theft were to run concurrently. The sentences for each count of burglary and the one count of conspiracy were to run consecutively to each other and concurrently with the sentences for grand theft. Petitioner is also…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. In Re CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. SaugstadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In re WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. United States v. Cleophas James Kearney, United States of America v. Eugene Lemon, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  4. People v. CooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. People v. RuizCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API