Legal Opinion

In Re Cruz

California Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1966No. Crim. 9515PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

— Petitioner and a codefendant, Roland Causey, were charged with conspiracy to commit grand theft (count 1) and grand theft (counts 2 through 4). Petitioner alone was charged with an additional count of grand theft (count 5). The jury found both of them guilty on counts 1 and 2 and petitioner guilty on counts 3 through 5; and the jury acquitted Causey on counts 3 and 4. Petitioner was sentenced to a term of imprisonment on each count, and it was ordered that the sentences as to counts 1 and 2 run consecutively and that the sentences as to counts 3, 4, and 5 run concurrently with count 2. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. People v. TiptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. People v. KellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Downs v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. People v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. In re WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. MoringlaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. People v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API