Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Saugstad

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1962No. Crim. 3237PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchottky, J.

O. E. Saugstad, James Quirk and William Kimball were tried by a jury on six counts, each charging a conspiracy to file false reports with the Department of Motor Vehicles and two counts of conspiracy to obtain money by false pretenses. All were found guilty of the six counts charging a violation of section 182, subdivision 1, of the Penal Code, in that they conspired to violate section 20 of the Vehicle Code by making a report of sale of a new vehicle although it was a used vehicle. Only Kimball was found guilty of the conspiracy charges relating to obtaining money by false pretenses.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Dealy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. People v. HoytCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. People v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. In Re RomanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. DupuyArizona Supreme Court · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API