Legal Opinion

In re Wright

California Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1967No. Crim. No. 10409PublishedCited by 149 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

. TRAYNOR, C. J.

Petitioners were convicted of kidnaping Linn Bayliss for the purpose of robbery, first degree, robbery of Bayliss,. and first degree robbery of Joseph Brody A The superior court imposed concurrent sentences. Petitioner Wright appealed, and the judgment against him was affirmed.. (People v. Wright (1963) 216 Cal.App.2d 866 [31 Cal.Rptr. 432].)

Petitioners seek a writ of habeas corpus on the ground that the convictions rest upon evidence obtained by an illegal search and seizure incident to an unlawful arrest. The writ is not available to attack a final judgment on this ground.…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  5. People v. ChessmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by149 opinions

  1. People v. BeamonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. People v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. People v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API