Legal Opinion

Cugley v. Bundy Incubator Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 13, 1937No. 7646PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Circuit Judge.

Appeal from a decree holding Patent No. 1,911,250 valid and infringed, and enjoining appellant company, which is a manufacturer of incubators competing with appellee, and appellant George Cugley, manager and vice-president of appellant company, from manufacturing or using structures which infringe. The patent is for a method, and the only claim involved is No. 5, which reads as follows:

“In a method of operating a mammoth incubator, placing eggs in an inclosure, heating the air to a constant temperature, stirring the air in the enclosure, humidifying the air to a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Smith v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Bassick Mfg. Co. v. RM Hollingshead Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Proudfit Loose Leaf Co. v. Kalamazoo Loose Leaf Binder Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  4. D'Arcy Spring Co. v. Marshall Ventilated Mattress Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  5. Hurlbut v. SchillingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  2. Enterprise Mfg. Co. v. Shakespeare Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  3. Great Lakes Equipment Company v. Fluid Systems, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  4. Susan McKnight, Inc. v. United Industries Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2017
  5. Mueller v. CampbellDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API