Legal Opinion

Hurlbut v. Schillinger

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 15, 1889No. 215PublishedCited by 54 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. In equity, to restrain alleged infringement of letters patent and for damages. Decree in favor of the complainants. Respondent appealed.

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. In equity, to restrain alleged infringement of letters patent and for damages. Decree in favor of the complainants. Respondent appealed. The case is stated in the opinion. cited: Smith v. Nichols, 21 Wall. 112; Roberts v. Ryer, 91 U. S. 150, 159; Heald v. Rice, 104 U. S. 737, 755; Atlantic Works v. Brady, 107 U. S. 192; Railroad Co. v. Sayles, 97 U. S. 554; Duff v. Sterling Pump Co., 107 U. S. 636; Carver v. Hyde, 16 Pet. 513; Burr v. Duryee, 1 Wall. 531; Fuller v. Yentzer, 94 U. S. 288; Brooks v. Fiske,…

1Opinion of the Court

¥b. Justice Blatchford

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a suit in-equity, brought in the Circuit Court of the' United States for the Northern Uistrict of Illinois, by John J. Schillinger and Elmer J. Salisbury against J. B.. Hurlbut, founded on the alleged infringement of reissued letters pat ent, No. 4364, granted to John J. Schillinger; May 2, 1871, for an “ improvement in concrete pavements,” on the surrender of original letters patent No. 105,599, granted to said Schillinger, July 19, 1870. The defences set up in the answer are the invalidity of the reissue, want of utility in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Callaghan v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Garretson v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. California Artificial Stone Paving Co. v. MolitorSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API