Legal Opinion
Mueller v. Campbell
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided April 22, 1946No. Civil Action No. 279PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEVIN, District Judge.
On September 10, 1945, plaintiffs filed a “Motion for Rule to Show Cause why Defendant, Harold C. Campbell, should not be attached, and/or fined for Contempt of Court.”
In their motion, plaintiffs “move this court for a rule upon the defendant, Harold C. Campbell, to show cause why he should not be attached and/or fined for contempt for violation of the judgment and injunction heretofore entered and granted in this cause.”
On September 21, 1945, plaintiffs filed a “Motion for Rule to Show Cause Why Defendant, H. D. Thomas, doing business as The Thomas Company, should not…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Sanitary Refrigerator Co. v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- IVES v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Black & Decker Mfg. Co. v. Baltimore Truck Tire Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hunt v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Priebe & Sons Co. v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- United States v. BrittenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Baltz v. Walgreen Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1961
- Mueller v. WolfingerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.