Legal Opinion

Muniz v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided July 16, 2010No. C 09-01987 CWPublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket Nos. 23 and 27)

CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Kim Muniz charges Defendant United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) with unlawful discrimination, retaliation and negligent hiring, training and supervision. She moves for leave to file an amended complaint. UPS opposes her motion and moves for summary judgment on her claims. Plaintiff opposes UPS’s motion as to all her claims, except that for age discrimination. Plaintiffs motion was…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Achal v. Gate Gourmet, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. Pinder v. Employment Development DepartmentDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2017
  3. Ferretti v. Pfizer Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  4. CRST, Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Taylor v. Trees, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2014

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API