Wright v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, C.J.
We granted this appeal to determine whether the appellant’s due process rights were violated when the lower courts dismissed his post conviction petition as time-barred by the three-year statute of limitations since the asserted violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), did not arise until after expiration of the three-year statute of limitations.
The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of the petition after concluding that the appellant’s interest in asserting and litigating the issue did not outweigh the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Burford v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Sands v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. SpurlockCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
- State v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- John Paul Seals v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Olen E. Hutchison v. Ricky Bell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- Howell v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
- Sample v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- Edward Jerome Harbison v. Ricky Bell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.