Legal Opinion

Burford v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1992PublishedCited by 596 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, Justice.

In this case, the only issue presented for our review is whether the petitioner’s claim for post-conviction relief is barred by the three-year statute of limitations contained in Tenn.Code Ann. § 40-30-102. Clearly, the post-conviction claim here was filed more than three years after the “final action of the state’s highest appellate court” and ordinarily would have been barred under the plain language of the statute. However, the grounds for relief (earlier enhancing convictions were declared void) occurred after the “state’s highest appellate court” action, and the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by596 opinions

  1. Archer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Passarella v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  3. Owens v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Sands v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  5. John Paul Seals v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2000

591 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API