State v. Spurlock
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JONES, Judge.
The appellant, Robert Spurlock, was convicted of murder in the first degree by a jury of his peers. The jury sentenced the appellant to life in the Department of Correction.
The appellant contends that his constitutional rights to due process of law and a fair trial were violated because the State of Tennessee failed to furnish him exculpatory evidence within the meaning of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). He further contends that the failure of the State of Tennessee to furnish this same material when timely requested violated Rule…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- State v. RiceTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. EdginTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- Robert Spurlock Ronnie Marshall v. Tommy P. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Spurlock v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.