Legal Opinion

Sands v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1995PublishedCited by 353 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DROWOTA, Justice.

The defendant, Robert Lee Sands, appeals from the Court of Criminal Appeals’ affir-mance of the trial court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of coram nobis or, in the alternative, for post-conviction relief. After consideration of the arguments of the defendant and the State, we conclude that both the coram nobis and post-conviction claims are time-barred, and therefore affirm the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 1977 the defendant Sands was convicted of armed robbery, kidnapping, and first-degree murder. He was sentenced…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Burford v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Moore, Owen, Thomas & Company v. L. Coleman Coffey and Robert Bruce Coffey, and L. Coleman Coffey and Robert Bruce Coffey v. Thomas O. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by353 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. John Paul Seals v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Ricky HARRIS v. STATE of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Artis Whitehead v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Olen E. Hutchison v. Ricky Bell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

348 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API