Sands v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DROWOTA, Justice.
The defendant, Robert Lee Sands, appeals from the Court of Criminal Appeals’ affir-mance of the trial court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of coram nobis or, in the alternative, for post-conviction relief. After consideration of the arguments of the defendant and the State, we conclude that both the coram nobis and post-conviction claims are time-barred, and therefore affirm the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In 1977 the defendant Sands was convicted of armed robbery, kidnapping, and first-degree murder. He was sentenced…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Burford v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Moore, Owen, Thomas & Company v. L. Coleman Coffey and Robert Bruce Coffey, and L. Coleman Coffey and Robert Bruce Coffey v. Thomas O. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by353 opinions
- Taylor v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- John Paul Seals v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Ricky HARRIS v. STATE of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Artis Whitehead v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- Olen E. Hutchison v. Ricky Bell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
348 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.