Legal Opinion

John Paul Seals v. State of Tennessee

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 2000No. E1998-00367-SC-R11-PCPublishedCited by 296 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · AndersonAnderson, C.J.

in which DROWOTA, BIRCH, BARKER, and HOLDER, JJ„ joined.

We granted review in this consolidated appeal to determine whether mental incompetency tolls the one-year statute of limitations for filing a post-conviction petition under either a savings provision or constitutional due process. The trial court dismissed the petitions for being time-barred. The Court of Criminal Appeals held that constitutional due process requires that the statute of limitations be tolled while a petitioner is mentally incompetent. We conclude that the statute of limitations is not tolled by a savings provision…

3Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Burford v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. PettusTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Owens v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Sands v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by296 opinions

  1. Norman Redwing v. Catholic Bishop for the Diocese of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Workman v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Williams v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Artis Whitehead v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. GomezTennessee Supreme Court · 2005

291 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API