Legal Opinion
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Andreini & Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 7, 2000No. B124064PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARAGON, J.*
In this insurance action, an insured sued an insurer and a broker. The insurer cross-claimed against the broker for indemnity. The insured and the broker settled. The trial court found that the settlement was *1416made in good faith and dismissed the insurer’s cross-claims against the broker. The insurer sought relief by way of a petition for writ of mandate, which was summarily denied.
After the entry of final judgment, the insurer filed this appeal, challenging the good faith settlement determination and the dismissal of its cross-claims. The broker has filed a motion to dismiss…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- White v. Ultramar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Jennings v. MarralleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Lackner v. LaCroixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- GACKSTETTER v. FrawleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Deocampo v. AhnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Wilshire Ins. Co. v. Tuff Boy Holding, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Maria D. v. Westec Residential Sec., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.