Legal Opinion
Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 27, 2011No. D057024PublishedCited by 234 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDONALD, J.
Defendant and cross-complainant San Diego Gas & Electric Company (SDGE) appeals an order dismissing its cross-complaint for equitable indemnity against cross-defendants Maurice Maio, David Zeiger, and Nantasket Court Condominium Association (collectively Owners) after the trial court found that Owners’ $25,000 settlement with plaintiff Shane Alan Cahill was made in good faith within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure section 877.6.1 On appeal, SDGE contends the trial court abused its discretion by granting Owners’ section 877.6 motion and dismissing its cross-complaint…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by234 opinions
- In re Tobacco Cases IICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- McDermott Will & Emery LLP v. Superior Court of Orange CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Dailey v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Alcoa Global Fasteners, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Basurto v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
229 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.