Wilshire Ins. Co. v. Tuff Boy Holding, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, Acting P. J.
Following entry of judgment in favor of defendant Tuff Boy Holding, Inc. (hereafter Tuff Boy) and against plaintiff Wilshire Insurance Company (hereafter Wilshire) on a claim for indemnity, Wilshire appeals from the judgment, challenging the trial court’s prejudgment grant of a motion for good faith settlement between Tuff Boy and the plaintiffs in an underlying tort action, which was consolidated with this indemnity suit. Wilshire contends the good faith settlement procedures of Code of Civil Procedure section 877.6 1 do not apply under the circumstances of this case…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. HullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Powers v. City of RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Rosen v. State Farm General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- GACKSTETTER v. FrawleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Interstate Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Cleveland Wrecking Co.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- O'Hearn v. Hillcrest Gym & Fitness Center, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.