Crockett v. Mathews
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate directed to the Auditor of Mendocino County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an application to this court for a writ of mandate requiring the defendant to draw a warrant upon the treasurer of the county of Mendocino, a county of the fourteenth class, in favor of plaintiff for the sum of forty dollars, alleged to be the amount of salary due plaintiff as justice of the peace of Ukiah township in said county for the month of June, 1909. The matter was submitted on a general demurrer to the petition.
Plaintiff is entitled to the relief demanded if his rights in regard to compensation are determined by the provisions of an act entitled “An act to amend section 4243…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stevenson v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Miller v. KisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Smith v. MathewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Welsh v. BramletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Vail v. San Diego CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Galeener v. HoneycuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Kilroy v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Applestill v. GaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Cox v. JeromeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Boyarsky v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.