Boyarsky v. Ross
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
This is a proceeding in mandamus. In his petition the petitioner sets forth that on the ninth day of October, 1931, he was appointed as a deputy clerk in the Justice’s Court of Oakland Township in Alameda County and that thereafter he qualified and ever since has been a duly appointed, qualified and acting clerk in said court; that the salary attached to said position is fixed by section 103 c of the Code of Civil Procedure in the sum of $180 per month; that since the date of his appointment the amount of salary earned prior to the filing of this application was the sum of $198.56; that the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bateman v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Longan v. County of SolanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Wood v. Board of Election CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- People Ex Rel. Richardson v. CobbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Kilroy v. WhitmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schoenfeld v. NorbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Los Angeles Brewing Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Los Angeles County Employees Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000