Legal Opinion
Bowers Dredging Co. v. New York Dredging Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington
Decided March 24, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANFORD, District Judge.
In the order denying the complainants’ application for a provisional injunction, there was reserved to the complainants a right to renew the application upon a further showing, which they have taken advantage of. In support of the new application, it has been shown that since the former hearing (77 Fed. 980) the decision of the United States circuit court for the Northern district of California in the case of Bowers v. Von Schmidt, 68 Fed. 572, has been affirmed by the circuit court of appeals (80 Fed. 121), and that a petition for a rehearing has been denied, so that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Von Schmidt v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1897
- Bowers Dredging Co. v. New York Dredging Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1896
- Chemical Rubber Co. v. Raymond Rubber Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1895
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lektophone Corp. v. Miller Bros.District Court, D. Delaware · 1930
- Bowers v. San Francisco Bridge Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1898
- Radio Corp. v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933