Legal Opinion

Von Schmidt v. Bowers

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 4, 1897No. 232PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. This was a suit in equity brought by Alphonzo B. Bowers against Allexey W. Von Schmidt to restrain infringement of letters patent No. 818,859, for ‘Dredging Machine,” and No. 355,251, for “Improvements in Hydraulic Dredging Machines,” both issued to Alphonzo B. Bowers,—the first on May 26, 1885, and the second on December 28, 1886. The lower court sustained both patents, and found…

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. This was a suit in equity brought by Alphonzo B. Bowers against Allexey W. Von Schmidt to restrain infringement of letters patent No. 818,859, for ‘Dredging Machine,” and No. 355,251, for “Improvements in Hydraulic Dredging Machines,” both issued to Alphonzo B. Bowers,—the first on May 26, 1885, and the second on December 28, 1886. The lower court sustained both patents, and found infringement of claims 10, 16, 25, 53, 54, and 59 of patent No. 318,859, and of claims 13, 17, and 18 of No. 355,251. 63…

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). This was a suit for the infringement of certain claims of certain letters patent. By his amended bill of complaint the complainant alleged that prior to December 9, 1876, he was the original and first inventor of certain new and useful inventions in dredging machines, machinery, and appliances, which were not known or used in this country, nor patented, nor described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country, prior to the inventions thereof by the complainant, nor had they been in public use or on sale in this country for two years prior to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Reckendorfer v. FaberSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  5. Hailes v. Van WormerSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re BooneU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1897
  2. Bake-Rite Mfg. Co. v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
  3. Los Angeles Art Organ Co. v. Æolian Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
  4. O'DONNELL v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1933
  5. Bowers v. Pacific Coast Dredging & Reclamation Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API