Bowers v. San Francisco Bridge Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
Bill in equity for infringement of letters patent Nos. 318,859, 318,860, 364,158, 364,571, 372,956, and 484,763. Decree for complainant.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Circuit Judge.
The original bill herein was filed March 21,1893, by the complainant, Alphonzo B. Bowers, against the defendant, the San Francisco Bridge Company, for the infringement of letters patent of the United States No. 318,859, dated May 26, 1885, for a “dredging machine”; No. 318,860, dated May 26, 1885, for the “art of dredging”; No. 364,158, dated May 31,1887, for “dredging apparatus”; No. 364.571, dated June 7,1887, for “dredging apparatus”; No. 372,956, dated November 8, 1887, for an “excavator”; and No. 484,763, dated October 18, 1892, for an “apparatus for dredging and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Ry. v. DeBowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
- Badische Anilin & Soda Fabrik v. KalleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1899
- General Talking Pictures Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
- Chadeloid Chemical Co. v. Frank S. De Ronde Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1906
- Mastoras v. HildrethCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.