Legal Opinion
Radio Corp. v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 29, 1933No. 440PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
These patents are based on an outstanding improvement in radio signaling systems which brought about exceedingly important advances in the art. Much litigation has re-*769suited. Armstrong was granted patent No. 1,113,149 on October 6, 1914, for a wireless receiving system which disclosed the system used by the defendant and admitted to infringe the plaintiff’s patents provided those patents are valid. "What effect, if any, may be given the disclosure of Armstrong is of vital concern here.
In a suit brought in this circuit on Armstrong’s patent it was held on March 13,1922,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Morgan v. DanielsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Butterworth v. United States Ex Rel. HoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Postum Cereal Co. v. California Fig Nut Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- National Foundry & Pipe Works v. Oconto Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Butler v. ShawU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1884
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Technidyne Corp. v. McPhilben-Keator, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Chenault v. Nebraska Farm Products, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1956
- Radio Corp. v. Collins Radio Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1936
- Bankers Trust Co. v. HenwoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937