Bowers Dredging Co. v. New York Dredging Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington
Tn Equity. Bill for tin injunction by tlie Bowers Dredging Company, Alphonzo B. Bowers, and John B. Brown, against the New York Dredging Company and certain employés and agents of said company, to restrain the defendants from infringing United States patent No. 318,859, for a dredging machine, granted to Alphonzo B. Bowers. The cause was heard upon the complainants’ application for an injunction pendente lite.
1Opinion of the Court
HANFOBD, District.
Judge. The patent upon which this suit is founded is described in the opinion of Judge McKenna in tin1 case of Bowers v. Von Schmidt, 63 Fed. 572-584. The bill of com plaint and affidavits on part of the complainants show that the Bowers Dredging Company is a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Illinois, and is operating and transacting business in the state of Washington, and, by an assignment from the patentee, has the sole right to use the invention covered by the above-mentioned letters patent, within the boundaries of the state of Washington, except at…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jensen v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1894
- Bowers v. Von SchmidtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1894
- Bowers v. San Francisco Bridge Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1895
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Grand Rapids v. Warren Bros.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- Baut v. Pethick Construction CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- Bowers Dredging Co. v. New York Dredging Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1897
- Bowers v. Pacific Coast Dredging & Reclamation Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1897
- Consolidated Rubber-Tire Co. v. Finley Rubber-Tire Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.