Legal Opinion

Chemical Rubber Co. v. Raymond Rubber Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey

Decided May 15, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This was a bill by the Chemical Rubber Company against: the Raymond Rubber Company and others for alleged infringement of certain patents relating to the art of treating rubber waste for the recovery of rubber therefrom.

1Opinion of the Court

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

Of the several letters patent mentioned in the bill, two only are now relied upon, viz. patent No. 300,-720, dated June 17, 1884 (application filed May 5, 1881), to N. Chapman Mitchell, for recovering rubber from waste, and patent No. 249,970, dated November 21, 1881 (application filed May 19, 1881), to the same patentee, for recovering rubber from rubber waste. It is insisted that all the claims of these two patents, have been infringed by Che defendants. Patent No. 300,720, expressly embraced muriatic acid as well as sulphuric acid, but by disclaimer filed on January…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Just v. Idaho Canal & Improvement Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Bowers Dredging Co. v. New York Dredging Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1897
  3. Fullerton Walnut Growers' Ass'n v. Anderson-Barngrover Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API