Legal Opinion

City of Tacoma v. Taxpayers of City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1987No. 51817-3PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

The City of Tacoma appeals a trial court's declaratory judgment invalidating Tacoma's electrical energy conservation ordinance. The ordinance authorizes Tacoma's municipally owned utility company, Tacoma City Light, to issue electric revenue bonds and use other funds to invest in energy conservation measures installed in privately owned, electrically heated, residential and commercial structures located within the utility's service area. Although the trial court found Tacoma's conservation program authorized by RCW 35.92.050, the court invalidated the program as a gift of public funds…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Chemical Bank v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hillis Homes, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. O'CONNELLWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Chemical Bank v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Seaboard Surety Co. v. Ralph Williams' Northwest Chrysler Plymouth, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Central Washington Bank v. Mendelson-Zeller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Washington Public Ports Ass'n v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Arborwood Idaho v. City of KennewickWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Arborwood Idaho, L.L.C. v. City of KennewickWashington Supreme Court · 2004

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API