Legal Opinion

Covell v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1995No. 61178-5PublishedCited by 122 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

Libby Coveil and John Backus, individually and as representatives of the class of persons similarly situated, appeal from a judgment upholding the City of Seattle’s residential street utility charge. The principal issue is whether this charge is an unconstitutionally imposed property tax.

The statutory authority for the residential street utility charge is RCW 82.80.040. This statute authorizes every city and town to

elect by action of its legislative authority to own, construct, maintain, operate, and preserve all or any described portion of its streets as a separate enterprise and facility,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Markham Advertising Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Contractors & Builders Ass'n v. City of DunedinSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  4. Hillis Homes, Inc. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. King County Fire Protection District No. 16 v. Housing AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1994

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by122 opinions

  1. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mahler v. SzucsWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. CJC v. Corporation of Catholic BishopWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Weden v. San Juan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API