Legal Opinion

City of Bridgeport v. Barbour-Daniel Electronics, Inc.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 4, 1988No. 5852PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDupont, C. J.

The plaintiff landlord appeals from a judgment of dismissal in this summary process action. The dispositive issue on appeal is whether a second notice to quit possession for nonpayment of rent may serve as the basis for a summary process action when a prior notice to quit possession for nonpayment of rent was statutorily defective. We conclude in this case that, because the first notice to quit possession was a nullity, it did not have the effect of terminating the lease, and, therefore, the second notice to quit was properly based upon the defendant tenant’s failure to pay rent *576for which a…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Webb v. AmblerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  2. Welk v. BidwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  3. Prevedini v. Mobil Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  4. Mayron's Bake Shops, Inc. v. Arrow Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  5. Jo-Mark Sand & Gravel Co. v. PantanellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Carnese v. MiddletonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  2. Waterbury Twin, LLC v. Renal Treatment Centers-Northeast, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Bargain Mart, Inc. v. LipkisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Chomko v. PatmonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  5. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Van SickleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API