Legal Opinion
Welk v. Bidwell
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 25, 1950PublishedCited by 73 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtInglis, J.
The question raised by the plaintiff’s appeal in this action is whether in the case of a month-to-month tenancy the tenant, by holding over after the landlord has notified him of an increase of rent, becomes obligated to pay that increase in spite of his protest. On the defendant’s appeal the questions are, first, whether the trial court erred in concluding that there had been no constructive eviction by the landlord and, second, whether the court erred in concluding that the plaintiff was not liable to the defendant for damage to the defendant’s personal property stored in the rented…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Colyear v. TobrinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Chambers v. LoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- W. G. Maltby, Inc. v. Associated Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- City Coal Co. v. MarcusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- School District No. 11 v. BatscheMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Gargano v. HeymanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Lonergan v. Connecticut Food Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- City of Bridgeport v. Barbour-Daniel Electronics, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Thomas v. RoperSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Carnese v. MiddletonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.