Legal Opinion
Waterbury Twin, LLC v. Renal Treatment Centers-Northeast, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 14, 2009No. SC 18218PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether a landlord, after withdrawing its complaint in a summary process action, is required to serve a new notice to quit pursuant to General Statutes § 47a-231 *461prior to filing a new summary process action against its tenant. The plaintiffs, Waterbury Twin, LLC, and 150 MH, LLC, appeal* 2 from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their summary process action against the defendants, Renal Treatment Centers-Northeast, Inc. (Renal Treatment Centers), and Davita, Inc. (Davita).3 Because we conclude that the plaintiffs’ withdrawal of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lampasona v. JacobsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Lusas v. St. Patrick's Roman Catholic Church Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Sicaras v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- City of Bridgeport v. Barbour-Daniel Electronics, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Housing Authority of East Hartford v. HirdConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cambridge Street Realty, LLC v. StewartMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
- Vidiaki, LLC v. Just Breakfast & Things!!! LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Presidential Village, LLC v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Worth v. Commissioner of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Hous. Auth. of the Town of Greenwich v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.