Legal Opinion

Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. Van Sickle

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 23, 1999No. AC 17483PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DUPONT, J.

The defendant, Karen Van Sickle, appeals from the trial court’s judgment of possession in a summary process action in favor of the plaintiff, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation. The defendant claims that a foreclosure judgment, in which she was not named as a party, did not affect her month-to-month tenancy, and that the plaintiffs summary process action was improper because the defendant’s right to occupy the premises had not been terminated by the foreclosure. The sole issue on appeal is whether an oral month-to-month tenancy survives a judgment of strict foreclosure.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Conference Center Ltd. v. TRC—The Research Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Lampasona v. JacobsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. City of Bridgeport v. Barbour-Daniel Electronics, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. Housing Authority of East Hartford v. HirdConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  5. City Lumber Co. of Bridgeport, Inc. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tappin v. Homecomings Financial Network, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. HUD/Willow Street Apartments v. GonzalezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  3. United Social & Mental Health Services, Inc. v. RodowiczConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  4. City of Bridgeport v. 2284 Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. Altama, LLC v. Napoli Motors, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API