Legal Opinion

Mason v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 25, 1993No. 91-1708LPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NETTESHEIM, Judge.

This case is before the court after trial limited, pursuant to RCFC 42(c), to the issue of whether plaintiffs’ complaint is barred by the six-year statute of limitations imposed by 28 U.S.C. § 2501 (1988). At issue is plaintiffs’ knowledge, actual or constructive, of erosion damage to their land allegedly caused by the construction of dams by the Army Corps of Engineers on the Ohio River. Plaintiffs filed their complaint in the United States Claims Court, now the Court of Federal Claims, on December 20, 1991. Therefore, plaintiffs’ claim must have accrued on or after…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. United States v. MottazSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Jewell M. Hart v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Catellus Development Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  2. Entines v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  3. McDonald v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  4. Figueroa v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
  5. Pride v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API