Legal Opinion
Entines v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 16, 1997No. 96-740CPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARGOLIS, Judge.
Plaintiffs, Filipino veterans who fought under United States command during World War II or their survivors, have sued the United States for back pay, just compensation under the Fifth Amendment, and breach of express or implied-in-fact contracts. The case is currently before the Court on the government’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint pursuant to Rule of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) 12(b)(1). The government argues that the applicable statute of limitations bars plaintiffs’ claims. Plaintiffs respond that the Court should toll the limitations period…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Hopland Band of Pomo Indians v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- The Japanese War Notes Association of the Philippines, Inc. (Japwancap, Inc.) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Klamath Tribe Claims Committee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Ingrum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Jeun v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Osborn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.