Legal Opinion

Copperweld Steel Co. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1944No. 29746PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

This proceeding is brought originally in this court by the Cbpperweld Steel Company, an employer complying with the workmen’s compensation law.' The real object sought by plaintiff is to bring about the disallowance of six claims, heretofore allowed by the Industrial Commission, to prevent the awards thereon from being taken into consideration in determining the merit rating to be applied to plaintiff’s risk.

The defendant filed a motion to strike out various parts of the petition, but, in view of statements made by counsel in open court on the presentation of the motion, this court now treats…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Armstrong v. DaveyOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  2. State Ex Rel. Nichols v. GregoryOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State Ex Rel. Powhatan Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932
  4. United States Wall Paper Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Copperweld Steel Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. State ex rel. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API