State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Comm.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The demurrer raises two questions:(1) Is mandamus a proper remedy to obtain the relief sought?(2) Are relators entitled to such relief?
If the answer to the first question is in the negative then it is unnecessary to proceed with a discussion of the merits of this action.
Although the demurrer is based on the ground that no cause of action is stated in the petition, it reaches the question of the propriety of the action for the reason that if mandamus is not an appropriate remedy, a petition in mandamus does not state a cause of action. Mandamus is a remedy recognized not only in the common law…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Slatmeyer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1936
- Copperweld Steel Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
- Copperweld Steel Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944
3Cited by28 opinions
- State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of BereaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- State ex rel. Dayton Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 44 v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. Butler v. DemisOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State ex rel. Frank Brown & Sons, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Liberty Mills, Inc. v. LockerOhio Supreme Court · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.