State Ex Rel. Armstrong v. Davey
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
The decision hinges on the determination of the question whether the respondent has committed such an abuse of his discretion as to warrant this court to intervene by writ of mandamus.
Neither the United States Constitution, the Ohio Constitution, ■ nor the statutes enacted pursuant thereto fix a time or impose a time limit for holding the special elections to fill vacancies in situations such as we have before, us in this case. The United States Constitution and the Constitution of Ohio provide that the time, place and manner of holding elections for the filling of vacancies…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fergus v. MarksIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
- State ex rel. Granville v. GregorySupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
3Cited by28 opinions
- American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, Inc. v. Robert Taft, Governor of OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- State ex rel. Gilligan v. HoddinottOhio Supreme Court · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Afscme v. TaftOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Copperweld Steel Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- State ex rel. Democratic Executive Committee v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.