State ex rel. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Industrial Commission

The problem in the present ease arises from the fact that appellee’s claim alleges two disabilities resulting from the original injury. The first disability was *59of a temporary nature and consisted of congestion and swelling in the anterior or front portion of claimant’s right eye. Subsequent to the discovery of this injury by claimant’s physician, a posterior eye condition developed, described variously as chorioretinitis, posterior uveitis or macular edema, which resulted in claimant’s loss of vision of the right eye. This loss of vision was not alleged in her complaint before the Court of…