Legal Opinion

United States Wall Paper Co. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1937No. 26250PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

By two separate and independent acts, the Industrial Commission of Ohio was given jurisdiction to make and enforce orders in two distinct classes of eases. For the sake of brevity, we shall allude to one of these acts as that commonly called the “Safety Code,” of which Section 871-38, General Code, is a part. The other act covers that class of cases which deals exclusively with the Workmen’s Compensation Act embodied in Section 1465-37 et seq., General Code.

In this case we confine ourselves solely to the decision of the question presented by the briefs of counsel on both sides, and that is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Slatmeyer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. State Ex Rel. Armstrong v. DaveyOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  3. State Ex Rel. Nichols v. GregoryOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Bowes v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Phelps Ex Rel. City of Findlay v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Copperweld Steel Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Retz v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State ex rel. Gladman v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API