Legal Opinion

Copperweld Steel Co. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1944No. 29746PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The petition in this case was held demurrable in Copperweld Steel Co. v. Industrial Commission, 142 Ohio St., 439, 52 N. E. (2d), 735, and the substance of the allegations in that pleading may be found in the opinion. Subsequently the plaintiff filed an amendment to the petition. The controlling question is whether the petition and amendment thereto-when considered together are subject to a general de murrer. The amendment sets out that at the time of the collision out of which the injuries and deaths resulting in the claims herein arose, the employees, injured and killed in such collision,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Copperweld Steel Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State Ex Rel. Powhatan Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. McAvoy v. H B Sherman Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Copperweld Steel Co. v. Industrial Commission of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. State Ex Rel. Cleveland Co-Operative Stove Co. v. CoffinberryOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Frank Lopiccolo Marion Lopiccolo v. Second Injury Fund of State of Michigan, Intervening v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API