Legal Opinion
N. C. Roberts Co. v. Topaz Transformer Products, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 1, 1966No. Civ. 7635; Civ. 7636; Civ. 7637; Civ. 7638; Civ. 7639; Civ. 7640; Civ. 7641; Civ. 7642PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhelan, J.
Eight different plaintiffs (appellants) have taken appeals in their separate actions from a single judgment.
The defendants in the eight actions were Topaz Transformer Products, Inc., a corporation (Topaz) and Robert L. McLoughlin and William D. Campbell, identified hereafter. The eight actions were consolidated for trial with an action for declaratory relief (No. 273044) in which Topaz, McLoughlin, Campbell and others were plaintiffs and the eight appellants were defendants.
As was proper, a single set of findings was made and a single judgment entered covering all nine actions. (Stanton v.…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Brant v. California Dairies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Stanton v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Domenigoni v. Imperial Live Stock & Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- David S. Sheehan and Barbara J. Sheehan v. Atlanta International Insurance Company and Integrity Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Clejan v. ReismanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Committee for Responsible Planning v. City of Indian WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Anderson v. City of La MesaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Riffle v. Robert L. Parker CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.