Legal Opinion
Clejan v. Reisman
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 11, 1970No. Civ. 33406PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHWEITZER, J.
Action by plaintiffs on a contract for the sale by plaintiffs to defendants of 350 shares of the capital stock of Gamble Ranch Investments, Inc.
Plaintiffs Arnold Clejan and Katherine Clejan, husband and wife, are the respondents and cross-appellants herein. Defendants Joe Benaron and J. J. Byrnes entered into a settlement with plaintiffs before trial and are no longer parties to this action. The remaining defendant, Samuel Reisman, is the appellant and cross-respondent herein.
Because of defendant Reisman’s contentions that various transactions were in violation of the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Morrison v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. ResnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Associated Vendors, Inc. v. Oakland Meat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- Minton v. CavaneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Serrano v. UnruhCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Schoolcraft v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- System Investment Corp. v. Union BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Horn v. SwoapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Stansfield v. StarkeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.