Legal Opinion

Committee for Responsible Planning v. City of Indian Wells

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1990No. E006796PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DABNEY, Acting P. J.

This controversy arises from the City of Indian Wells’ approvals for and adoption of redevelopment plans and environmental impact reports (EIRs) for the Roadrunner Redevelopment Project Area (Roadrunner project) and Consolidated Whitewater Redevelopment Project Area (Whitewater project). Appellant, Committee for Responsible Planning (Committee), appeals from judgments entered by stipulation between respondents, the City of Indian Wells, its redevelopment agency, and the individual members of its city council and redevelopment agency (referred to collectively herein…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. General Motors Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Bank of California v. ConnollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Knodel v. KnodelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Tinsley v. Palo Alto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jennings v. MarralleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Friedland v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Hamilton v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Planning and Conservation League v. Department of Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. In Re Marriage of GoddardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API